
Major Findings #6
Communities With More Opportunities For Participation In Prevention Positively Impact
Substance Use By Youth
Since the National Cross-Site Evaluation was studying youth in actual community settings, some of the youth in
comparison groups would have the opportunity to enter prevention programs other than the CSAP program under
study. In order to identify the degree to which this occurred, and the effects on study findings, data were gathered
on the availability of prevention programming in the school and community environments of study youth. When
study communities were divided into those that offered higher and lower opportunity for participation in prevention
programs, an important finding emerged. Comparison youth in communities that offered more prevention services
reported significantly lower rates of substance use relative to comparison youth in communities that offered fewer
prevention opportunities.
| Average Change in Substance Use From Program Entry to Exit for Comparison Group Youth: Sites
With Low and High Opportunity for Comparison Group Prevention Participation
(n = 4,341) |
|
These findings have important implications.
- The results indicate that comparison youth in sites with high opportunity for prevention participation have lower
rates of use than youth in sites with fewer available prevention resources. This supports the Cross-Site Evaluation
conclusion that “Prevention Works” for high-risk youth.
- The results indicate that prevention effects in sites with higher availability of prevention services will be underestimated
because comparison youth in these field settings also benefit from prevention. To make sure the findings
of the study are accurate, estimates of the magnitude of prevention effects on youth are made using the 23 sites
in which comparison youth had lower opportunity to participate in prevention programs.
This finding also suggests that prevention effectiveness is often underestimated in evaluation studies in which
comparison youth have opportunities to participate in prevention activities within the community.
Back to Table of Contents

|
|
|